The Militant (logo)  
   Vol. 70/No. 6           February 13, 2006  
 
 
Union rat under fire from bosses
 
BY BRIAN WILLIAMS  
NEW YORK—The display by unionists of large inflatable rubber rats on public streets against bosses’ antiunion operations is facing a legal challenge before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). A ruling is expected soon, reported the December 28 New York Times.

The rats have had a visible presence at nonunion work sites around this city over the past nine years—from numerous building construction projects to New York University where graduate teaching assistants are on strike for union recognition. “At any given moment, labor leaders say, as many as 35 rubber rats are at work around the region,” the Times noted.

Legal action against the right to hoist these rats to back union fights was undertaken by Concrete Structures Inc., a concrete pouring firm. In 2002 the company filed a complaint with the NLRB against the Laborers’ International Union for setting up rats at several of its sites on Long Island as part of job actions against poor working conditions and the use of nonunion labor.

Last March NLRB administrative law judge Steven Davis ruled in support of the employer. “The union’s use of the rat,” he wrote, “constituted confrontational conduct intended to persuade third persons not to do business with Concrete.” The judge claimed the rat is a “well-known symbol” of “an invisible picket line they should not cross.”

Describing the rat as “an imposing figure” 15 or 30 feet high, the judge added, “The body of the rat is gray with pink eyes, ears and nose. It sits on its haunches with its front paws outstretched and claws extended. Its mouth is open, baring its teeth.”

The union has appealed this ruling. Lowell Peterson, the lawyer for the Laborers in the case, said that if the government board upholds its antiworker ruling, then “it will not matter [since] the unions have a host of beasts in their menagerie,” the Times reported. “You don’t like the rat?” Peterson said. “Fine. We’re going to use a skunk.”  
 
 
Front page (for this issue) | Home | Text-version home